research evaluation/reflection

So far, the conversation between many of the authors of my research have been mostly informative. By informative I mean primarily presenting the facts. In the research that I found about the quantity versus quality in the study by Christina Haas, the conversation was intended to make the reader make his of her own interpretation. Haas presented her findings and made her stance about the findings, but also asked the reader to do the same. I think that this was the most reoccuring problems within my research. I was researching what it means to be a "good writer" as well as some general idea of what "more writting" is. Yes these two items are extremely open ended, but with a lot of specific research they can be closed to at least a crack so find some solid stance and or answer. Since my research was slightly open ended, I think that that is the main reason that the conversation between all of the authors of me research left their findings a little up for discussion from the reader, in other words the author left the reader interpret the findings instead of just presenting the findings the the final answer/interpretation of them.